Scoresheet for Observations and Interpretations Only Assignment

 Note: This scoresheet assumes that students were asked to label each sentence in their paper with the correct "epistemic category" (1-6) in their scientific argument.

Observations (30 points)

1. Figure with world map shows location of small area

0 - 1 - 2

2. Adequate data are acquired. Data are relevant to the investigation

0 ‑ 2 ‑ 4

3. Observations are clear and quantitative

0 ‑ 2 ‑ 4

4. Observations are supported by figures AND are adequately referenced in the text

0 ‑ 2 ‑ 4

5. Figures have informative figure captions

0 - 1 - 2

6. Symbols used are explained

0 ‑ 1 ‑ 2

7. Observations include descriptions of relationships between features

0 ‑ 2 ‑ 4

8. There is a clear distinction between observations and interpretations

0 ‑ 2 ‑ 4

9. Correct epistemic categories have been given in all sentences

0 ‑ 2 ‑ 4

Interpretations (16 points)

10. Correct interpretation of the tectonic boundary and the related plate tectonic model

0 ‑ 2 ‑ 4

11. The problem, model, and supporting data are clearly connected in the text and figure(s), showing that the interpretations follow logically from the data

0 ‑ 2 ‑ 4

12. Correct epistemic categories have been given in all sentences

0 ‑ 2 ‑ 4

13. Adequately describes tectonic model using cartoon-like sketch

0 ‑ 2 ‑ 4

Overall (4 points)

14. Word count is between 400 and 600 words.

0 ‑ 2 ‑ 4

 

Google

WWW http://earthednet.org/lwd http://earthednet.org
 

NSF Logo